Horsfield Menzies : Blog vs Behaviour – Daniel Rubin : MAULED ACROSS SOCIAL MEDIA
Daniel Rubin once wrote approvingly about social media doing something genuinely useful: spotting institutional bullshit that the institution itself had
Horsfield Menzies: Blog vs Behaviour places the firm’s polished public image beside its documented conduct in the Cepac tribunal saga. A running comparison of brochure language, professional claims and what happened when the rhetoric met a real litigant.
Daniel Rubin once wrote approvingly about social media doing something genuinely useful: spotting institutional bullshit that the institution itself had
Fresh from HM Histories following Angus Menzies through another stretch of the respectable CV, Blog vs Behaviour gets to return
Rachel Rigg has already wandered through Blog vs Behaviour twice. First came the sermon about complaints, investigations and reasoned explanations.
Joanne Alvey has written an article about recruitment decision-making which ought to make somebody at Horsfield Menzies slightly uncomfortable around
Simon Horsfield has written an article about workplace culture that reads rather differently when you already have Simon Horsfield sitting
Rachel Yorke has already told the Horsfield Menzies readership that Tribunal delay can operate attritionally and “grind down a claimant”.
Rachel Yorke has managed to fit one of the grubbiest sentences I have seen on an employment law firm’s website
Rachel Rigg has chosen an unusually dangerous metaphor for somebody writing under the Horsfield Menzies logo. Her article, “DSARs AS
Rachel Rigg has written a complaints procedure for organisations that apparently enjoy leaving an audit trail behind them. Her Horsfield